In which case I might as well just take notes in Jarte and then paste them into Cinta for tagging and organizing, but that's not what I want Cinta for because then Cinta would be a middle man in my personal workflow.Ĭolin, thanks for your opinion! I agree with most of it, however I have to take into account other considerations. If I were going to do that I could just as easily copy the note into Jarte (my primary RTF application) correct it and then paste it back in.

I have both Aspell and Hunspell installed, but I don't know how to configure it to real time check spelling in Cinta, or even check it on demand.

So, then when I copy and paste the note into something designed for more complex documents, like Scrivner, LibreOffice, or ConnectedText, I have to correct all the spelling errors. This indicates to me that it is designed for long text, at least as a possibility. One feature I love about Cinta, that many other 'buckets' don't do is the ability to work on a note in its own screen. I like it and keep wanting to use it as a primary 'anything bucket.' For quick notes spell check doesn't really matter, but for stuff I want to develop later it does. I assumed any modern software that deals with text has spell checking, at least as a plugin, like Notepad++. Votes are cast only by those who use it, visit the forums, know there is voting, and decide something is important enough to request it or vote it up. If they know it lacks a feature in advance they won't try it.

If people download and try it and discover it is lacking a feature that is a must for them they won't use it. I am not sure 'votes' is a good way to determine a feature.

Notepad++ spell check plugin